STEM
On February 28, 1928, C.V. Raman discovered the scattering of light that would win him the Nobel Prize — the first Asian scientist to receive it in the sciences. India celebrates National Science Day on February 28 each year in his honour. But here is the question that deserves to sit uncomfortably at the centre of those celebrations: how many children in the villages of Rajasthan, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh will ever hold a test tube, look through a microscope, or write a line of code?
The answer, right now, is not enough. And the consequences of that answer will shape India's scientific and economic future far more than any number of elite research institutes.
India's STEM Paradox: Elite Excellence, Mass Exclusion
India produces some of the world's finest scientists and engineers. The IITs are globally respected. Indian-origin researchers lead laboratories across the United States and Europe. The Chandrayaan-3 mission's successful lunar south pole landing in 2023 was a moment of genuine national pride.
But this excellence is concentrated in a remarkably thin stratum of the population — urban, upper-middle-class, English-medium educated, with access to coaching centres, science kits, and parents who can help with homework. It sits atop a base of mass scientific illiteracy that the country has never honestly reckoned with.
ASER 2022 reported that only 25.9 percent of Class 3 rural children could perform basic subtraction. By Class 8, only 42.7 percent could solve a simple three-step arithmetic problem. These children are the potential scientists, engineers, and science teachers of the next generation — and they are being failed comprehensively by the system before they ever reach secondary school, where formal science education begins.
The Ministry of Education's Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE+) data for 2021–22 shows that nearly 23 percent of rural upper primary schools lack a science laboratory. In many states, laboratory equipment exists on paper — purchased with government grants, listed in procurement registers — but is locked in storerooms or non-functional. Science is taught from textbooks, by teachers who may not have studied science beyond Class 12, to children who have never conducted an experiment.
✦ ✦ ✦
For context on the broader educational challenges that form the backdrop to this STEM gap, see our analysis of education in rural India.
Why STEM in Early Childhood Matters More Than We Acknowledge
The conventional understanding places science education firmly in secondary school — Class 9 onwards, with proper physics, chemistry, and biology textbooks. This is too late.
Cognitive science research over the past two decades has demonstrated that scientific thinking — the ability to form hypotheses, test them, and update beliefs based on evidence — begins developing in early childhood. Children as young as three naturally engage in causal reasoning. They ask why. They experiment. They are, in developmental psychologists' terms, natural scientists.
What formal education does, in too many cases, is extinguish this natural curiosity by replacing exploration with memorisation. Science becomes a subject to be crammed rather than a way of thinking to be developed. The rote-learning culture of Indian education — relentlessly documented by ASER and reinforced by board examination culture — is particularly toxic for scientific thinking.
"Early exposure to hands-on science activities — growing plants and measuring them, mixing materials to observe reactions, building simple structures with blocks, observing insects and recording what they see — builds the foundational habits of mind that make formal science education powerful when it arrives."
Early exposure to hands-on science activities — growing plants and measuring them, mixing materials to observe reactions, building simple structures with blocks, observing insects and recording what they see — builds the foundational habits of mind that make formal science education powerful when it arrives. Without this foundation, secondary science is an exercise in memorising formulae that students cannot connect to any lived experience.
✦ ✦ ✦
For a fuller case for why STEM skills are foundational to India's future, see our post on the importance of STEM education for India's children.
Meena's Classroom: What Science Looks Like in a Rural School
In a government upper primary school in Tonk district, Rajasthan, a Class 7 science teacher named Rameshwari has thirty-eight children in her room. The textbook prescribed for Class 7 science includes chapters on heat, motion, acids and bases, and the life cycle of cells. The school has no functioning laboratory. The nearest town with a science supply shop is forty kilometres away.
Rameshwari is not incompetent. She passed her B.Ed. She genuinely wants her students to understand science. But she teaches heat as a chapter to be memorised, not as a phenomenon to be experienced. She has never conducted a titration. She is not sure herself how to demonstrate Newton's laws without equipment.
Among her thirty-eight students sits Meena, the daughter of a farmer, who at twelve already knows more about seed germination and soil moisture than most agricultural extension officers — because she has spent her life watching her father's crops. But no one has ever connected her field knowledge to the scientific principles that explain it. Her curiosity about why the wheat grows taller on one side of the field than the other has never been turned into a hypothesis, a test, a result.
Meena is a scientist who has never been told she is one. India is full of Meenas.
✦ ✦ ✦
The Gender Dimension of Rural STEM Exclusion
The exclusion from STEM education in rural India is not gender-neutral. It falls disproportionately and deliberately on girls.
NFHS-5 data shows that girls in rural areas are significantly less likely to complete secondary education than boys — and secondary school is when formal science education takes hold. Cultural norms in large parts of Rajasthan, UP, and Bihar actively discourage girls from pursuing education that is seen as unnecessary or even dangerous to marriage prospects. Girls who show academic ability are frequently praised for it in the abstract while being pulled out of school when the family needs labour or when a marriage opportunity arises.
The scarcity of female science teachers in rural areas compounds the problem. Role models matter enormously in the early formation of academic identity. A girl who has never seen a woman conduct an experiment, teach a science class, or hold a professional identity as a scientist has a harder path to imagining herself in that role.
"International evidence from countries that successfully expanded girls' STEM participation — including Rwanda, which now has among the highest rates of female STEM graduates in Africa — consistently shows that the lever is not aptitude."
International evidence from countries that successfully expanded girls' STEM participation — including Rwanda, which now has among the highest rates of female STEM graduates in Africa — consistently shows that the lever is not aptitude. It is access, encouragement, and visible role models. The same lesson applies in India's villages.
What Quality STEM Education in Rural Areas Actually Requires
The gap between India's STEM ambitions and its rural STEM realities will not be closed by annual science day celebrations or by urban coding boot camps that reach less than one percent of the school-going population.
✦ ✦ ✦
Teacher Capacity and Subject Specialisation
Science cannot be taught well by a generalist teacher with no science background, using a textbook as a script. Yet this is the dominant mode of science instruction in rural India's upper primary schools. The NEP 2020 recommends subject specialisation from Class 6 onwards — a reform that would help enormously if implemented. Subject specialist teachers who are trained, mentored, and regularly updated in science pedagogy are the single highest-leverage investment in rural STEM education.
Low-Cost Experiential Learning
Equipping every rural school with a fully fitted laboratory is a desirable long-term goal. The short-term reality is that experiential science learning can be delivered with almost no equipment at all — using water, soil, seeds, local plants, simple electrical components, and the mathematics of everyday life. The Agastya Foundation model, which uses low-cost science kits and mobile science labs to reach rural children across seventeen states, has demonstrated that curiosity and hands-on learning are not dependent on expensive infrastructure.
Locally grounded science activities — measuring local temperature variation, studying local crops and pests, mapping local water sources, calculating the economics of a household's energy consumption — connect scientific method to children's lived realities in ways that textbook chemistry can never do.
Community and Family Engagement
Science education does not happen only in school. Parents who express curiosity, who discuss how things work, who reward questioning over deference, create home environments that support scientific thinking. This is not primarily about parental education level — it is about communicating the value of questioning and evidence-seeking as cultural norms.
Community science events, village-level science fairs, and engagement with local agricultural and environmental knowledge as legitimate scientific starting points all build the cultural ecosystem that makes formal STEM education stick.
✦ ✦ ✦
At MMF, we believe that the scientific curiosity of a child in a village deserves exactly the same cultivation as the scientific curiosity of a child in a city. Geography of birth should not be a career-limiting condition.
India's STEM Future Depends on Who Gets to Participate
India's stated ambition — to become a global knowledge economy, a leader in space technology, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and clean energy — requires a dramatically larger base of scientifically literate citizens than the country currently produces.
The IITs cannot supply this base alone. The urban private school system cannot supply this base alone. The 1.2 million government schools that educate the majority of India's children — most of them in rural and semi-urban areas — must be the foundation of India's STEM future. There is no other option that reaches the scale required.
Every child who understands the scientific method, who can reason with data, who has the mathematical foundations to engage with technology — every such child is a contribution to the innovation economy India needs. Every Meena who goes unrecognised, whose natural curiosity about seed germination is never connected to science, is a subtraction from the country's collective capacity to solve problems.
National Science Day should be not just a celebration of C.V. Raman's genius. It should be a reckoning with the millions of unrecognised geniuses sitting in under-resourced classrooms, waiting for someone to tell them that the questions they are already asking are science.
If you want to be part of building rural India's STEM future, get involved with education programmes that are working to close this gap — or donate to support the hands-on learning initiatives that are turning curiosity into capacity, one child at a time.
Write for Us
Share your expertise with our readers
We welcome guest articles on parenting, child development, early education, and child welfare. Send your pitch or draft to Director@mahadevmaitri.org.