Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #30

This page covers 9 middle schools in NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #30. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

9
Schools Ranked
New York
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 9 of 9
1
rank
HUNTERS POINT COMMUNITY MIDDLE SCHOOL
Grades 06–08365 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.8:1)
67
/100
Student:Teacher
8.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Free Lunch
74%
High economic need
2
rank
IS 141 STEINWAY (THE)
Grades 06–081,049 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.8:1)
61
/100
Student:Teacher
12.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Free Lunch
64%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
IS 204 OLIVER W HOLMES
Grades 06–08341 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.2:1)
54
/100
Student:Teacher
8.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
91%
High economic need
4
rank
IS 10 HORACE GREELEY
Grades 06–08662 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.2:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
12.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
49/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
84%
High economic need
5
rank
IS 230
Grades 06–081,010 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.9:1)
53
/100
Student:Teacher
12.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
81%
High economic need
6
rank
ALBERT SHANKER SCHOOL FOR VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS
Grades 06–08387 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.3:1)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
10.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
83%
High economic need
7
rank
IS 145 JOSEPH PULITZER
Grades 06–081,513 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
51
/100
Student:Teacher
13.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
91%
High economic need
8
rank
IS 227 LOUIS ARMSTRONG
Grades 05–081,528 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
16.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Free Lunch
68%
High economic need
9
rank
ACADEMY FOR NEW AMERICANS
Grades 06–08116 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.6:1)
47
/100
Student:Teacher
11.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
34/100
Below nat'l median
Free Lunch
86%
High economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
9
Middle Schools
50
Total Schools
67
#1 Score
54
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
Compare NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT #30 with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.