Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Chesterfield County Public Schools

This page covers 39 elementary schools in Chesterfield County Public Schools. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

39
Schools Ranked
Virginia
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 39
1
rank
Woolridge Elementary
Grades PK–05804 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
57
/100
Student:Teacher
16.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
8%
Low economic need
2
rank
O.B. Gates Elementary
Grades PK–05563 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.5:1)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
10.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
37%
Low economic need
3
rank
W.W. Gordon Elementary
Grades PK–05577 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
16.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
15%
Low economic need
4
rank
Evergreen Elementary
Grades PK–05811 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
14.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
49/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
30%
Low economic need
5
rank
Alberta Smith Elementary
Grades PK–05626 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
16.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
34%
Low economic need
6
rank
Spring Run Elementary
Grades PK–05872 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
17.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
23%
Low economic need
7
rank
Greenfield Elementary
Grades PK–05462 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
13.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
33%
Low economic need
8
rank
J.B. Watkins Elementary
Grades PK–05814 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
16.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
49/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
15%
Low economic need
9
rank
Bettie Weaver Elementary
Grades PK–05609 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
15.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
4%
Low economic need
10
rank
Old Hundred Elementary
Grades PK–05997 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
17.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
49/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$13,693
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
12%
Low economic need
29 more elementary schools in Chesterfield County Public Schools not shown here.
View all schools in Chesterfield County Public Schools
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
39
Elementary Schools
63
Total Schools
57
#1 Score
49
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
Compare Chesterfield County Public Schools with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.