Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in TULSA

This page covers 9 middle schools in TULSA. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

9
Schools Ranked
Oklahoma
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 9 of 9
1
rank
TRAICE MS
Grades 06–08229 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.4:1)
46
/100
Student:Teacher
10.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
28/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
80%
High economic need
2
rank
EDISON PREPARATORY MS
Grades 06–08822 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
43
/100
Student:Teacher
23.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
53/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
65%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
DANIEL WEBSTER MS
Grades 06–08350 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
17.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
91%
High economic need
4
rank
THOREAU DEMONSTRATION ACADEMY
Grades 06–08442 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
41
/100
Student:Teacher
24.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
54/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
76%
High economic need
5
rank
WILL ROGERS COLLEGE MS
Grades 06–08694 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
41
/100
Student:Teacher
16.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
37/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
93%
High economic need
6
rank
MONROE DEMONSTRATION MS
Grades 06–08688 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
36
/100
Student:Teacher
19.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
35/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
95%
High economic need
7
rank
MEMORIAL MS
Grades 06–08626 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
36
/100
Student:Teacher
22.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
90%
High economic need
8
rank
CARVER MS
Grades 06–08656 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
34
/100
Student:Teacher
26.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
31/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
60%
Near nat'l 52.2%
9
rank
CENTRAL MS
Grades 06–08293 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
32
/100
Student:Teacher
25.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$15,952
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
94%
High economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
9
Middle Schools
66
Total Schools
46
#1 Score
39
Avg Score
District profileTULSA
Top Ranked Middle School
1
TRAICE MS
Score: 46/100
Compare TULSA with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.