Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in UTICA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

This page covers 10 elementary schools in UTICA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

10
Schools Ranked
New York
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 10
1
rank
HUGH R JONES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06405 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.7:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
60
/100
Student:Teacher
11.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
55%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
JOHN F HUGHES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06355 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.8:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
58
/100
Student:Teacher
10.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
81%
High economic need
3
rank
ALBANY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06513 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.9:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
12.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
75%
High economic need
4
rank
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06303 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.1:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
11.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
91%
High economic need
5
rank
THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06456 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.0:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
11.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
47/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
80%
High economic need
6
rank
ROSCOE CONKLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06511 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.3:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
12.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
76%
High economic need
7
rank
GENERAL HERKIMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06597 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.1:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
56
/100
Student:Teacher
12.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
47/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
76%
High economic need
8
rank
KERNAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06566 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.3:1) · above-average investment ($22,561/student)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
13.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
47/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
81%
High economic need
9
rank
WATSON WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06630 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,561/student)
55
/100
Student:Teacher
13.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
88%
High economic need
10
rank
CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06639 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($22,561/student)
54
/100
Student:Teacher
14.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$22,561
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
82%
High economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
10
Elementary Schools
13
Total Schools
60
#1 Score
57
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Compare UTICA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.