Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
High Schools

Best High Schools
in CITRUS

This page covers 8 of the 9 high schools in CITRUS had enough federal data to rank, including 1 charter school. Rankings use a composite of graduation rates, neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

8
Schools Ranked
Florida
State
1
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

High Schools Rankings

Showing 8 of 8
1
rank
CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL
Grades 09–121,249 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
66
/100
Graduation Rate
88%
Nat'l avg 86.5%
Student:Teacher
19.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
2
rank
LECANTO HIGH SCHOOL
Grades 09–121,630 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (97%)
64
/100
Graduation Rate
97%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
18.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
3
rank
CITRUS HIGH SCHOOL
Grades 09–121,503 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (92%)
63
/100
Graduation Rate
92%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
18.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
4
rank
CAMP E-NINI HASSEE
Grades 06–1220 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.0:1)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
10.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
5
rank
CITRUS ESCHOOL 6-12
Grades 06–12174 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
15.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
6
rank
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS
Grades 06–1228 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
46
/100
Student:Teacher
14.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
7
rank
ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Grades 09–12117 studentsCharter
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
41
/100
Student:Teacher
19.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
8
rank
CYPRESS CREEK TREATMENT CENTER
Grades 06–1269 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.5:1)
39
/100
Graduation Rate
25%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
11.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,891
Below nat'l avg
How We Rank High Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the high school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Graduation Rate
40%
The most direct outcome measure available at the school level. Percentage of students who complete high school, from EDFacts federal data.
Neighborhood Opportunity
25%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score reflecting long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this neighbourhood.
Student-Teacher Ratio
20%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
15%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
8
High Schools
28
Total Schools
66
#1 Score
52
Avg Score
District profileCITRUS
Top Ranked High School
1
CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL
Score: 66/10088% graduation
Compare CITRUS with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), EDFacts (graduation rates), and the Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.