Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Teton County School District #1

This page covers 7 elementary schools in Teton County School District #1. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Wyoming
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
Moran Elementary
Grades KG–0510 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (3.3:1) · above-average investment ($24,740/student)
87
/100
Student:Teacher
3.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$24,740
Above nat'l avg
2
rank
Alta Elementary
Grades KG–0540 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.0:1) · above-average investment ($24,740/student)
83
/100
Student:Teacher
8.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$24,740
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
8%
Low economic need
3
rank
Colter Elementary
Grades KG–05293 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.9:1) · above-average investment ($24,740/student)
81
/100
Student:Teacher
8.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$24,740
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
8%
Low economic need
4
rank
Jackson Elementary
Grades KG–05296 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.9:1) · above-average investment ($24,740/student)
81
/100
Student:Teacher
8.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$24,740
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
12%
Low economic need
5
rank
Kelly Elementary
Grades KG–0545 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.0:1) · above-average investment ($24,740/student)
79
/100
Student:Teacher
9.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$24,740
Above nat'l avg
6
rank
Wilson Elementary
Grades KG–05188 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.8:1) · above-average investment ($24,740/student)
77
/100
Student:Teacher
11.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$24,740
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
6%
Low economic need
7
rank
Munger Mountain Elementary School
Grades KG–05366 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.8:1) · above-average investment ($24,740/student)
76
/100
Student:Teacher
10.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$24,740
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
23%
Low economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Elementary Schools
10
Total Schools
87
#1 Score
81
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
Moran Elementary
Score: 87/100
Other School Levels
Compare Teton County School District #1 with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.