Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Campbell County School District #1

This page covers 17 elementary schools in Campbell County School District #1. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

17
Schools Ranked
Wyoming
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 10 of 17
1
rank
Little Powder Elementary
Grades KG–0823 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (5.0:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
80
/100
Student:Teacher
5.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
13%
Low economic need
2
rank
Recluse School
Grades KG–0815 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (4.4:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
76
/100
Student:Teacher
4.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
40%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
4-J Elementary School
Grades KG–0641 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.1:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
74
/100
Student:Teacher
9.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
10%
Low economic need
4
rank
Conestoga Elementary
Grades KG–06373 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.1:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
67
/100
Student:Teacher
11.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
32%
Low economic need
5
rank
Paintbrush Elementary
Grades KG–06278 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.3:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
67
/100
Student:Teacher
11.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
28%
Low economic need
6
rank
Cottonwood Elementary
Grades PK–06195 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.5:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
66
/100
Student:Teacher
10.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
42%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
Rawhide Elementary
Grades KG–06118 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.4:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
9.4:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
58%
Near nat'l 52.2%
8
rank
Rozet Elementary
Grades KG–06259 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.1:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
11.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
42%
Near nat'l 52.2%
9
rank
Prairie Wind Elementary
Grades KG–06367 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.0:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
12.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
34%
Low economic need
10
rank
Pronghorn Elementary
Grades KG–06363 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.5:1) · above-average investment ($18,145/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
12.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,145
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
27%
Low economic need
7 more elementary schools in Campbell County School District #1 not shown here.
View all schools in Campbell County School District #1
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
17
Elementary Schools
23
Total Schools
80
#1 Score
66
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Other School Levels
Compare Campbell County School District #1 with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.