Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in SPRING ISD

This page covers 9 middle schools in SPRING ISD. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

9
Schools Ranked
Texas
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 9 of 9
1
rank
SPRING LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
Grades 06–08322 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.5:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
10.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
84%
High economic need
2
rank
SPRINGWOODS VILLAGE MIDDLE
Grades 06–08511 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
14.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
70%
High economic need
3
rank
EDWIN M WELLS MIDDLE
Grades 06–08907 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
47
/100
Student:Teacher
14.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
53/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
89%
High economic need
4
rank
EDWARD ROBERSON MIDDLE
Grades 06–08791 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
46
/100
Student:Teacher
14.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
78%
High economic need
5
rank
DUEITT MIDDLE
Grades 06–08773 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
15.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
84%
High economic need
6
rank
TWIN CREEKS MIDDLE
Grades 06–08973 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
14.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
83%
High economic need
7
rank
STELLE CLAUGHTON MIDDLE
Grades 06–08912 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
43
/100
Student:Teacher
14.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
94%
High economic need
8
rank
BAMMEL MIDDLE
Grades 06–08837 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
40
/100
Student:Teacher
15.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
96%
High economic need
9
rank
RICKEY C BAILEY MIDDLE
Grades 06–081,065 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
40
/100
Student:Teacher
17.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$12,850
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
85%
High economic need
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
9
Middle Schools
42
Total Schools
51
#1 Score
45
Avg Score
District profileSPRING ISD
Top Ranked Middle School
Compare SPRING ISD with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.