Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
High Schools

Best High Schools
in INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF TEXAS (ILTEXAS)

This page covers 7 high schools in INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF TEXAS (ILTEXAS), including 7 charter schools. Rankings use a composite of graduation rates, neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Texas
State
7
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

High Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
ILTEXAS GARLAND H S
Grades 09–12580 studentsCharter
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (98%) · small class sizes (12.8:1)
70
/100
Graduation Rate
98%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
12.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
54/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$9,160
Below nat'l avg
2
rank
ILTEXAS AGGIELAND H S
Grades 09–12212 studentsCharter
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.3:1)
57
/100
Student:Teacher
9.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$9,160
Below nat'l avg
3
rank
ILTEXAS LANCASTER DESOTO H S
Grades 09–12209 studentsCharter
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.9:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
10.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$9,160
Below nat'l avg
4
rank
ILTEXAS KELLER SAGINAW H S
Grades 09–12753 studentsCharter
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.3:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
13.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$9,160
Below nat'l avg
5
rank
ILTEXAS HOUSTON WINDMILL LAKES OREM H S
Grades 09–12602 studentsCharter
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.3:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
13.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$9,160
Below nat'l avg
6
rank
ILTEXAS ARLINGTON-GRAND PRAIRIE H S
Grades 09–12740 studentsCharter
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
14.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$9,160
Below nat'l avg
7
rank
ILTEXAS KATY WESTPARK H S
Grades 09–12786 studentsCharter
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
16.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$9,160
Below nat'l avg
How We Rank High Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the high school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Graduation Rate
40%
The most direct outcome measure available at the school level. Percentage of students who complete high school, from EDFacts federal data.
Neighborhood Opportunity
25%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score reflecting long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this neighbourhood.
Student-Teacher Ratio
20%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
15%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
High Schools
37
Total Schools
70
#1 Score
53
Avg Score
Top Ranked High School
1
ILTEXAS GARLAND H S
Score: 70/10098% graduation
Compare INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF TEXAS (ILTEXAS) with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), EDFacts (graduation rates), and the Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.