Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Lawrence County

This page covers 8 elementary schools in Lawrence County. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

8
Schools Ranked
Tennessee
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 8 of 8
1
rank
South Lawrence Elementary
Grades PK–08540 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
49
/100
Student:Teacher
14.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
46/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
2
rank
Ethridge Elementary
Grades PK–08498 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
45
/100
Student:Teacher
15.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
3
rank
Ingram Sowell Elementary
Grades PK–05428 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
45
/100
Student:Teacher
13.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
34/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
4
rank
Summertown Elementary
Grades PK–06646 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
17.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
5
rank
David Crockett Elementary
Grades PK–05462 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
43
/100
Student:Teacher
14.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
34/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
6
rank
Lawrenceburg Public
Grades PK–05500 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
16.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
34/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
7
rank
Leoma Elementary
Grades PK–08538 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
18.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
8
rank
New Prospect Elementary
Grades PK–08434 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
41
/100
Student:Teacher
16.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
34/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,977
Below nat'l avg
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
8
Elementary Schools
14
Total Schools
49
#1 Score
44
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Other School Levels
Compare Lawrence County with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.