Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Cumberland County

This page covers 9 elementary schools in Cumberland County. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

9
Schools Ranked
Tennessee
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 9 of 9
1
rank
North Cumberland Elementary
Grades PK–08551 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
14.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
2
rank
Pine View Elementary
Grades PK–08187 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.1:1)
49
/100
Student:Teacher
11.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
3
rank
Crab Orchard Elementary
Grades PK–08458 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
15.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
4
rank
South Cumberland Elementary
Grades PK–08587 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
16.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
5
rank
Frank P. Brown Elementary
Grades PK–08615 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
16.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
6
rank
Glenn Martin Elementary
Grades PK–08764 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
17.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
7
rank
Stone Elementary
Grades PK–08624 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
17.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
8
rank
Homestead Elementary School
Grades PK–08722 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
41
/100
Student:Teacher
18.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
9
rank
Pleasant Hill Elementary
Grades PK–08613 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
41
/100
Student:Teacher
16.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
37/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$10,016
Below nat'l avg
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
9
Elementary Schools
12
Total Schools
50
#1 Score
44
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Other School Levels
Compare Cumberland County with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.