Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in Onslow County Schools

This page covers 8 middle schools in Onslow County Schools. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

8
Schools Ranked
North Carolina
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 8 of 8
1
rank
New Bridge Middle
Grades 06–08490 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
49
/100
Student:Teacher
17.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
40%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
Trexler Middle
Grades 06–08825 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
17.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
45%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Dixon Middle
Grades 06–08948 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
18.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
39%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Northwoods Park Middle
Grades 06–08688 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
45
/100
Student:Teacher
17.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
52%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
Swansboro Middle
Grades 06–08967 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
45
/100
Student:Teacher
17.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
43%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
Jacksonville Commons Middle
Grades 06–081,011 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
43
/100
Student:Teacher
16.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
64%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
Hunters Creek Middle
Grades 06–08922 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
19.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
55%
Near nat'l 52.2%
8
rank
Southwest Middle
Grades 06–08527 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
18.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,413
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
64%
Near nat'l 52.2%
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
8
Middle Schools
39
Total Schools
49
#1 Score
45
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
1
New Bridge Middle
Score: 49/100
Compare Onslow County Schools with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.