Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in GRETNA PUBLIC SCHOOLS

This page covers 7 elementary schools in GRETNA PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Nebraska
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
PALISADES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–05490 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($27,971/student)
75
/100
Student:Teacher
14.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$27,971
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
6%
Low economic need
2
rank
WHITETAIL CREEK ELEMENTARY
Grades PK–05538 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($27,971/student)
74
/100
Student:Teacher
15.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$27,971
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
7%
Low economic need
3
rank
ASPEN CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–05481 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($27,971/student)
74
/100
Student:Teacher
15.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$27,971
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
4%
Low economic need
4
rank
SQUIRE JOHN THOMAS ELEMENTARY
Grades PK–05390 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($27,971/student)
70
/100
Student:Teacher
13.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
60/100
Above nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$27,971
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
15%
Low economic need
5
rank
GRETNA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–05463 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($27,971/student)
69
/100
Student:Teacher
14.5:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
60/100
Above nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$27,971
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
13%
Low economic need
6
rank
HARVEST HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–05417 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($27,971/student)
68
/100
Student:Teacher
15.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
60/100
Above nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$27,971
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
6%
Low economic need
7
rank
FALLING WATERS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–05516 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($27,971/student)
63
/100
Student:Teacher
15.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$27,971
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
13%
Low economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Elementary Schools
10
Total Schools
75
#1 Score
70
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Compare GRETNA PUBLIC SCHOOLS with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.