Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in JACKSON R-II

This page covers 7 elementary schools in JACKSON R-II. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Missouri
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
WEST LANE ELEM.
Grades KG–04385 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.6:1)
52
/100
Student:Teacher
12.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,587
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
34%
Low economic need
2
rank
GORDONVILLE ATTENDANCE CTR
Grades KG–0254 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
51
/100
Student:Teacher
14.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,587
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
31%
Low economic need
3
rank
MILLERSVILLE ATTENDANCE CTR.
Grades KG–0244 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.6:1)
51
/100
Student:Teacher
10.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
41/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,587
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
55%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
NORTH ELEM.
Grades KG–04265 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
14.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,587
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
43%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
EAST ELEMENTARY
Grades PK–04717 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
15.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,587
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
31%
Low economic need
6
rank
SOUTH ELEM.
Grades KG–04409 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.1:1)
50
/100
Student:Teacher
13.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,587
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
54%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
ORCHARD DRIVE ELEM.
Grades KG–04388 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
49
/100
Student:Teacher
13.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
44/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,587
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
52%
Near nat'l 52.2%
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Elementary Schools
10
Total Schools
52
#1 Score
50
Avg Score
District profileJACKSON R-II
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
WEST LANE ELEM.
Score: 52/100
Compare JACKSON R-II with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.