Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools
in ROSEMOUNT-APPLE VALLEY-EAGAN

This page covers 7 of the 8 middle schools in ROSEMOUNT-APPLE VALLEY-EAGAN had enough federal data to rank. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Minnesota
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Middle Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
196Online Middle School
Grades 06–0876 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (12.9:1)
58
/100
Student:Teacher
12.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
54/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,310
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
42%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
ROSEMOUNT MIDDLE
Grades 06–081,205 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
55
/100
Student:Teacher
19.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
54/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,310
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
20%
Low economic need
3
rank
DAKOTA HILLS MIDDLE
Grades 06–081,158 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
19.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,310
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
17%
Low economic need
4
rank
FALCON RIDGE MIDDLE
Grades 06–08970 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
54
/100
Student:Teacher
16.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,310
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
35%
Low economic need
5
rank
SCOTT HIGHLANDS MIDDLE
Grades 06–081,184 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
17.8:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,310
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
28%
Low economic need
6
rank
BLACK HAWK MIDDLE
Grades 06–08894 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
16.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,310
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
43%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
Valley Middle School of STEM
Grades 06–081,076 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
17.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$16,310
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
48%
Near nat'l 52.2%
How We Rank Middle Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the middle school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
35%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Reflects long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this area.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Particularly important during the middle years when academic and social needs are at their most complex.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
15%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Reflects the economic profile of the community the school serves.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
Middle Schools
41
Total Schools
58
#1 Score
54
Avg Score
Top Ranked Middle School
Compare ROSEMOUNT-APPLE VALLEY-EAGAN with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.