Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
High Schools

Best High Schools
in OSSEO PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

This page covers 7 of the 9 high schools in OSSEO PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT had enough federal data to rank. Rankings use a composite of graduation rates, neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Minnesota
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

High Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
PARK CENTER IB WORLD SCHOOL
Grades 09–121,908 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($18,446/student)
69
/100
Graduation Rate
81%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
17.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,446
Above nat'l avg
2
rank
Osseo Education Center
Grades 12–1282 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (5.7:1) · above-average investment ($18,446/student)
66
/100
Student:Teacher
5.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,446
Above nat'l avg
3
rank
MAPLE GROVE SENIOR HIGH
Grades 09–122,324 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (93%) · above-average investment ($18,446/student)
65
/100
Graduation Rate
93%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
23.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,446
Above nat'l avg
4
rank
OSSEO SENIOR HIGH
Grades 09–122,280 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($18,446/student)
64
/100
Graduation Rate
88%
Nat'l avg 86.5%
Student:Teacher
21.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
51/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,446
Above nat'l avg
5
rank
279Online Learning Program 9-12
Grades 09–12195 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.8:1) · above-average investment ($18,446/student)
61
/100
Student:Teacher
8.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
47/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,446
Above nat'l avg
6
rank
ALC INDEPENDENT STUDY
Grades 09–123 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($18,446/student)
58
/100
Graduation Rate
68%
Below nat'l avg
Opportunity
47/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,446
Above nat'l avg
7
rank
ALC SENIOR HIGH
Grades 09–12164 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (8.7:1) · above-average investment ($18,446/student)
43
/100
Graduation Rate
17%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
8.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
47/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,446
Above nat'l avg
How We Rank High Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the high school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Graduation Rate
40%
The most direct outcome measure available at the school level. Percentage of students who complete high school, from EDFacts federal data.
Neighborhood Opportunity
25%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score reflecting long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this neighbourhood.
Student-Teacher Ratio
20%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
15%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
High Schools
33
Total Schools
69
#1 Score
61
Avg Score
Top Ranked High School
1
PARK CENTER IB WORLD SCHOOL
Score: 69/10081% graduation
Compare OSSEO PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), EDFacts (graduation rates), and the Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.