Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
High Schools

Best High Schools
in Worcester

This page covers 7 high schools in Worcester. Rankings use a composite of graduation rates, neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
Massachusetts
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

High Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
Worcester Technical High
Grades 09–121,469 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (98%) · above-average investment ($28,304/student)
75
/100
Graduation Rate
98%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
14.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
40/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$28,304
Above nat'l avg
2
rank
University Pk Campus School
Grades 07–12224 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (93%) · above-average investment ($28,304/student)
73
/100
Graduation Rate
93%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
15.0:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$28,304
Above nat'l avg
3
rank
Doherty Memorial High
Grades 09–121,344 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($28,304/student)
73
/100
Graduation Rate
90%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
15.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
50/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$28,304
Above nat'l avg
4
rank
Burncoat Senior High
Grades 09–121,179 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($28,304/student)
69
/100
Graduation Rate
83%
Nat'l avg 86.5%
Student:Teacher
17.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$28,304
Above nat'l avg
5
rank
North High
Grades 09–121,377 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($28,304/student)
68
/100
Graduation Rate
80%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
16.1:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
48/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$28,304
Above nat'l avg
6
rank
Claremont Academy
Grades 07–12488 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($28,304/student)
67
/100
Graduation Rate
82%
Nat'l avg 86.5%
Student:Teacher
15.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
39/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$28,304
Above nat'l avg
7
rank
South High Community
Grades 09–121,666 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($28,304/student)
66
/100
Graduation Rate
77%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
16.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
43/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$28,304
Above nat'l avg
How We Rank High Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the high school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Graduation Rate
40%
The most direct outcome measure available at the school level. Percentage of students who complete high school, from EDFacts federal data.
Neighborhood Opportunity
25%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score reflecting long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this neighbourhood.
Student-Teacher Ratio
20%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
15%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
High Schools
46
Total Schools
75
#1 Score
70
Avg Score
District profileWorcester
Top Ranked High School
1
Worcester Technical High
Score: 75/10098% graduation
Compare Worcester with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), EDFacts (graduation rates), and the Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.