Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Arkansas City

This page covers 6 elementary schools in Arkansas City. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

6
Schools Ranked
Kansas
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 6 of 6
1
rank
C 4 Elem
Grades PK–05110 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
15.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,425
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
44%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
I X L Elem
Grades PK–05197 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (13.1:1)
49
/100
Student:Teacher
13.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,425
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
80%
High economic need
3
rank
Roosevelt Elem
Grades PK–05208 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
48
/100
Student:Teacher
13.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,425
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
80%
High economic need
4
rank
Adams Elem
Grades PK–05297 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
46
/100
Student:Teacher
16.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,425
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
80%
High economic need
5
rank
Jefferson Elem
Grades PK–05269 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
46
/100
Student:Teacher
17.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,425
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
73%
High economic need
6
rank
Frances Willard Elem
Grades PK–05276 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
17.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
45/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$14,425
Near nat'l avg
Free Lunch
86%
High economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
6
Elementary Schools
8
Total Schools
50
#1 Score
47
Avg Score
StateKansas →
District profileArkansas City →
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
C 4 Elem
Score: 50/100
Other School Levels
Compare Arkansas City with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.