Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in LAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT

This page covers 8 elementary schools in LAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

8
Schools Ranked
Idaho
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 8 of 8
1
rank
NORTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–06187 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
55
/100
Student:Teacher
14.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
27%
Low economic need
2
rank
KOOTENAI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades KG–06350 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
53
/100
Student:Teacher
14.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
40%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
FARMIN STIDWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–06505 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
51
/100
Student:Teacher
15.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
40%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
SAGLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–06290 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
17.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
31%
Low economic need
5
rank
SOUTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–06183 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
50
/100
Student:Teacher
16.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
34%
Low economic need
6
rank
HOPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–06117 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
49
/100
Student:Teacher
15.9:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
49/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
54%
Near nat'l 52.2%
7
rank
WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades PK–06308 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
49
/100
Student:Teacher
17.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
31%
Low economic need
8
rank
LPOSD HOME SCHOOL ACADEMY
Grades KG–0884 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
11
/100
Student:Teacher
51.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,560
Below nat'l avg
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
8
Elementary Schools
13
Total Schools
55
#1 Score
46
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Other School Levels
Compare LAKE PEND OREILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.