Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Enfield School District

This page covers 6 elementary schools in Enfield School District. Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

6
Schools Ranked
Connecticut
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 6 of 6
1
rank
Henry Barnard School
Grades KG–02365 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (9.6:1) · above-average investment ($53,577/student)
66
/100
Student:Teacher
9.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$53,577
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
46%
Near nat'l 52.2%
2
rank
Edgar H. Parkman School
Grades 03–05269 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.1:1) · above-average investment ($53,577/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
10.1:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$53,577
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
48%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Eli Whitney School
Grades 03–05339 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.9:1) · above-average investment ($53,577/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
10.9:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$53,577
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
48%
Near nat'l 52.2%
4
rank
Hazardville Memorial School
Grades KG–02329 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.6:1) · above-average investment ($53,577/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
10.6:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$53,577
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
44%
Near nat'l 52.2%
5
rank
Prudence Crandall School
Grades 03–05341 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (10.7:1) · above-average investment ($53,577/student)
65
/100
Student:Teacher
10.7:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$53,577
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
50%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
Enfield Street School
Grades KG–02285 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.2:1) · above-average investment ($53,577/student)
64
/100
Student:Teacher
11.2:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$53,577
Above nat'l avg
Free Lunch
48%
Near nat'l 52.2%
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
6
Elementary Schools
8
Total Schools
66
#1 Score
65
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
1
Other School Levels
Compare Enfield School District with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.