Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
High Schools

Best High Schools
in Fontana Unified

This page covers 7 high schools in Fontana Unified. Rankings use a composite of graduation rates, neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score below the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

7
Schools Ranked
California
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

High Schools Rankings

Showing 7 of 7
1
rank
Henry J. Kaiser High
Grades 09–121,978 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (98%) · above-average investment ($18,411/student)
75
/100
Graduation Rate
98%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
20.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,411
Above nat'l avg
2
rank
Jurupa Hills High
Grades 09–121,829 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (95%) · above-average investment ($18,411/student)
73
/100
Graduation Rate
95%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
20.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,411
Above nat'l avg
3
rank
Fontana A. B. Miller High
Grades 09–122,125 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($18,411/student)
72
/100
Graduation Rate
91%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
19.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,411
Above nat'l avg
4
rank
Summit High
Grades 09–122,539 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (94%) · above-average investment ($18,411/student)
71
/100
Graduation Rate
94%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
22.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,411
Above nat'l avg
5
rank
Fontana High
Grades 09–122,459 students
Ranked for: strong graduation rate (95%) · above-average investment ($18,411/student)
65
/100
Graduation Rate
95%
Above nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
19.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
38/100
Below nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,411
Above nat'l avg
6
rank
Eric Birch High (Continuation)
Grades 10–12291 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($18,411/student)
63
/100
Graduation Rate
67%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
14.8:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,411
Above nat'l avg
7
rank
Citrus High (Continuation)
Grades 10–12387 students
Ranked for: above-average investment ($18,411/student)
61
/100
Graduation Rate
67%
Below nat'l avg
Student:Teacher
17.0:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$18,411
Above nat'l avg
How We Rank High Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the high school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Graduation Rate
40%
The most direct outcome measure available at the school level. Percentage of students who complete high school, from EDFacts federal data.
Neighborhood Opportunity
25%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score reflecting long-run economic outcomes for children raised in this neighbourhood.
Student-Teacher Ratio
20%
Lower ratio = smaller classes. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
15%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
7
High Schools
44
Total Schools
75
#1 Score
69
Avg Score
Top Ranked High School
1
Henry J. Kaiser High
Score: 75/10098% graduation
Compare Fontana Unified with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), EDFacts (graduation rates), and the Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.