Mahadev Maitri Foundation
US Initiatives
Elementary Schools

Best Elementary Schools
in Kingman Unified School District (79598)

This page covers 8 elementary schools in Kingman Unified School District (79598). Rankings use a composite of neighborhood opportunity, class sizes, and per-student investment — signals available consistently from federal data across all US public schools. Schools in this district score near the national median on neighborhood opportunity. Use these rankings as a starting point; pair them with school visits and conversations with local parents before making any enrollment decision.

8
Schools Ranked
Arizona
State
None
Charter Schools
RankingsHow We RankFAQAbout Data

Elementary Schools Rankings

Showing 8 of 8
1
rank
Kingman Online Learning Academy (KOLA) Elementary School
Grades KG–0517 students
Ranked for: small class sizes (11.3:1)
58
/100
Student:Teacher
11.3:1
Below nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
2
rank
La Senita Elementary
Grades PK–05207 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
44
/100
Student:Teacher
17.3:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
66%
Near nat'l 52.2%
3
rank
Black Mountain Elementary School
Grades KG–08470 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
42
/100
Student:Teacher
17.4:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
77%
High economic need
4
rank
Desert Willow Elementary School
Grades KG–05467 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
39
/100
Student:Teacher
19.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
75%
High economic need
5
rank
Hualapai Elementary
Grades KG–05799 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
39
/100
Student:Teacher
22.2:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
46%
Near nat'l 52.2%
6
rank
Cerbat Elementary
Grades KG–05700 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
37
/100
Student:Teacher
20.6:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
78%
High economic need
7
rank
Manzanita Elementary
Grades KG–05793 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
36
/100
Student:Teacher
22.7:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
63%
Near nat'l 52.2%
8
rank
Mt Tipton Elementary School
Grades PK–06176 students
Scores consistently across all ranking signals
35
/100
Student:Teacher
23.5:1
Near nat'l 15.4:1
Opportunity
42/100
Near nat'l median
Per-Pupil Spend
$11,694
Below nat'l avg
Free Lunch
90%
High economic need
How We Rank Elementary Schools

Each school receives a composite score (0–100) built from 4 federal data signals, weighted to reflect what matters most at the elementary school level. All signals are normalised against national benchmarks so a school's score reflects its standing across the entire US, not just within this district.

Neighborhood Opportunity
40%
Harvard Opportunity Atlas score for the school's neighbourhood. Higher means children from this area historically achieve stronger economic outcomes.
Student-Teacher Ratio
30%
Lower ratio = smaller classes = more individual attention per child. Normalised against national range.
Per-Pupil Expenditure
20%
Annual district spending per enrolled student from the NCES F-33 Finance Survey. Compared against national average.
Free Lunch Rate
10%
Percentage of students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunch. Used as a neighbourhood economic-context signal.
Test scores are excluded: they are not published as consistent open federal data across all states, making reliable cross-district comparison impossible with this signal alone.
District at a Glance
8
Elementary Schools
14
Total Schools
58
#1 Score
41
Avg Score
Top Ranked Elementary School
Other School Levels
Compare Kingman Unified School District (79598) with neighbouring districts
⇄ Compare districts
Frequently Asked Questions
About This Data

All figures on this page come directly from US federal open datasets: NCES Common Core of Data (enrollment, school characteristics, student-teacher ratios), NCES F-33 Finance Survey (per-pupil expenditure), Harvard Opportunity Atlas (neighbourhood opportunity scores). Federal data is published on an annual cycle and may not reflect the very latest school-year changes. Rankings reflect available data and should be used as a starting point — not a substitute for visiting schools or consulting district resources directly. What this ranking does not measure: teacher quality, classroom culture, extracurricular programmes, school safety, or parent and student satisfaction.